![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
"The
later Mah€y€na defined the two co-efficients that in union sparked off,
as it were, the absolute truth of Buddhahood, namely 'Wisdom' [the lotus]
concieved as feminine (Sanskrit: prajń€) and the 'means,' [vajra] concieved
as masculine (Sanskrit: up€ya), ...the vajra represents the male element
and the lotus the female." Snellgrove, David ed. 1978p. 425
See:
Przyluski, Jean. "Le Voyage du Buddha dans le Nord-Ouest de l'Inde." Journal
Asiatique (1914).
|
Again in this context we see the violent,
warrior like qualities of Vajrap€Ši rise to the surface of his mythology.
He is chosen explicitly for his strength and power over the beloved disciple
of the Buddha. While this selection of Vajrap€Ši over šnanda is definitely
a later interpolation, as Mahay€na Buddhism developed and the teachings of the Buddha began spreading throughout South and Central Asia, many authors and sculptors felt the need for a stronger companion for the Buddha. Vajrap€Ši, as a Buddhist version of the warrior function seemed the obvious choice. In this period of cultural exchange throughout
Central Asia and Western India competition for patronage must have been
intense and as a result, the Buddha needs a figure by his side who is
not simply endowed with spiritual power, but also a figure who embodies
this-worldly power. This is thus manifest in the two companions of the
Buddha, AvalokiteŹvara and Vajrap€Ši, and is a distinction that will be
more explicitly articulated in late Mahay€na and their division of the
lotus and Vajra families. |